• pjfin123 3 days ago

    Cloudflare R2 has been huge for my open source project Argos Translate. Two years ago I was getting swamped with $250/mo+ bandwidth bills for a project with minimal revenue. Now I distribute 10TB+ per month of model weights for $0. I'm still on the free plan

  • jauntywundrkind 3 days ago

    $2.18 / 0.015$/GB*mo comes to 143 GB months of store data.

    This would ignore the upload costs and any API costs.

    • langsoul-com 2 days ago

      This price is solely to deliver 15tb of video.

      Don't get confused like other commenter.

      • mappu 2 days ago

        Depending on your content, switching from `-preset veryfast` to `veryslow` could let you drop the bitrate by as much as 20-30% at the same visual quality. Your users will thank you for it,

        • john-baker-11 2 days ago

          Good read. I thought you were talking about cloudflare stream which charges similar to other comparisons you drew in the blog.

          This works because you dont have complexity of real time encoding, muxing. It quickly becomes a complex infra to manage if we do that ourselves.

          I am curious what CDN are you using and what are rough configs?

          • Tiberium 2 days ago

            Can anyone explain how this is possible when most other providers charge huge costs for egress? Is Cloudflare operating at a loss here?

          • ndiddy 2 days ago

            The article title is somewhat misleading. The "15 terabyte" figure refers to the amount of bandwidth used, not the amount of video being stored (it's closer to 145 GB).

            • KomoD 2 days ago

              It's not misleading at all, they are delivering 15TB of video for $2.18.

              It doesn't say they're storing 15TB for $2.18, it says they're delivering it.

            • peter_d_sherman 3 days ago