• abcd_f 20 hours ago

    There is another Far, with a bit more history behind it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_Manager

    • eddythompson80 19 hours ago

      Man, I remember the first time I came across Far Manager. It was through ConEmu in 2010. I was pretty confused with Far tbh. Couldn’t really figure out who or why you would use it. Then I saw someone actually using it at work.

      The Wiki doesn’t go much into the demographic for such file manager. It does say they predate GUI file managers, which is fair I guess, but I always thought you lived by cd/ls/find/cat/etc then. I still do for the most part.

      • abcd_f 18 hours ago

        Far is a Norton Commander clone, and the NC was ubiquitous in pre-Windows era. It felt like it was on every single machine that ran DOS. Its dual-panel design is really quite ingenious as it speeds up the majority of routine file operations, especially when working with ad-hoc file sets. Just need to learn the keyboard shortcuts :)

        • thesz 14 hours ago

          Far is for Windows, where "find" and "cat" are problematic, to say the very least.

          In that area, Far is game-changing.

          And even today I use Midnight Commander in Linux because I used to Norton/Volkov Commander and then Far. ;)

        • ilyagr 16 hours ago

          Far manager now exists on Linux and Mac: https://github.com/elfmz/far2l

          I got it from nixpkgs, not sure if it's easy to install otherwise.

        • mattpavelle 20 hours ago

          The FAQ doesn’t say so anyone know how this is better than [RPL](https://linux.die.net/man/1/rpl) (which I’ve used for years)?

        • SubiculumCode 18 hours ago

          I appreciate the submission, but wish it had a lot more context given (e.g. in a blog post). For example, for someone who hasn't used find and replace in Sublime, how is it different than find and replace available in most text editors? How is this different than sed?

          • SoftTalker 17 hours ago

            > How is this different than sed?

            Less powerful but easier to use for simple cases?

          • cssinate 20 hours ago

            README says `--tartget` - is that really the flag? Or is it supposed to say `target`?

            • _Henry_ 20 hours ago

              It's a typo. From the source code, it's spelled "target"

            • dima55 18 hours ago

              Obvious question: how is this better than `perl -p -i -e s/Foo/Bar/g src/*/*.rs`?

              • nkrisc 18 hours ago

                I can understand the example in the repo just from reading it. Without the context I would have had no idea what posted is search and replace. So it’s got that going for it.

                • dima55 15 hours ago

                  The example in the repo is `far --find "Foo" --replace "Bar" --tartget "./src/*/*.rs"`. If the value here is to not know how to use a regex, that's not very compelling

                  • nkrisc an hour ago

                    For you, perhaps.

                • pacifika 18 hours ago

                  Less slashes and parameters

                • ilyagr 15 hours ago

                  Depending on the interface you prefer, there are also

                  https://github.com/ms-jpq/sad https://github.com/chmln/sd

                  that haven't been mentioned yet

                  • llimllib 17 hours ago

                    I use fastmod[1] and enjoy it

                    [1]: https://github.com/facebookincubator/fastmod

                    • iwontberude 18 hours ago

                      I appreciate the willpower to not call this fart.

                      • babuloseo 15 hours ago

                        RUST.