• e40 a day ago

    The unintended consequences of this seem really wild and monumental. This could transform business and government and it scares the heck out of me.

    • blitzar a day ago

      They will pay it now, and avoid political retribution. They will then wait a year or two, challenge it as unconstitutional and get the money back. Probably wont even take a court case, just a simple letter to whoever is collecting the money and it will be over.

      • gmerc a day ago

        You think this authoritarian fascism thing will blow over, do you

        • blitzar 21 hours ago

          I am learning Mandarin in preparation for the inevitable exodus.

      • cma a day ago

        Article I, Section 9, Clause 5

        No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

        • lesuorac 19 hours ago

          I see two easy ways to get around this.

          1. It's a fee and not a tax.

          2. Require the chips to be claimed as shipped from DC or another non-state.

          And the more practical way.

          3. Just don't ever hear the case challenging it.

          • disqard 18 hours ago

            You forgot:

            4. If the POTUS does it, it's not a crime.

            and

            5. It's for National Security -- surely you don't want us giving our AI technology away to China without extracting something in return?

            There are many ways to handle this -- just watch Faux News, if this ever rises above the threshold of the ambient craziness and becomes "newsworthy".

            • cma 15 hours ago

              Initial tariffs on China were billed to be about fentanyl being exported to the US, largely by mail. Put into place just a few days after Trump pardoned the largest opiates by mail operator in world history, Ross Ulbricht.

              • lesuorac 12 hours ago

                I didn't know Ross ran USPS.

                It is a bit unfortunate how much Trump gets a pass for not solid decision making.