Their CEO was terrible and had to step down until suddenly he was a great guy and now taxpayer funds go into that company?
Gelsinger was their best chance to turn it around, in my view. The better results seen in the last quarter were due to Gelsinger IMHO.
Pat G. refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging.
> refused to discuss in detail the IA-64 project in a published retrospective on his career. That's...not encouraging
Why is he required to respond to anything after he’s retired?