• jasonjmcghee 5 days ago

    It doesn't mention it in the article, but guessing this is based on / inspired by AlphaEvolve?

    Though I'm not sure the public can access AlphaEvolve yet.

    (https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13131)

    • gerdesj 5 days ago

      If AlphaEvolve is: "a quality-diversity search framework for algorithm discovery" then maybe.

      At the moment I'm mildly skeptical and uncertain of whether to twist or stick.

      • jasonb05 5 days ago

        Agreed, not mentioned.

        Nevertheless, I see a link to github for the OpenEvolve project [1] that in turn states:

        > Open-source implementation of AlphaEvolve

        [1] https://github.com/algorithmicsuperintelligence/openevolve

      • DoctorOetker 5 days ago

        Very interesting that the LLM weights are co-evolved and reasoning skills improve!

        • viraptor 5 days ago

          What do you mean by this? I can't find anything there about modifying the used LLMs and the hosted ones wouldn't be possible to change. Do I misunderstand the convolved part you mentioned?

          • DoctorOetker 5 days ago

            you are correct, on re-reading they only evolved the prompts ...

        • N_Lens 5 days ago

          Some cool optimisations here: MAP elites, island models to prevent premature convergence & fast rejection of bad candidates.

          What's particularly interesting is the meta level insight: The system discovered scipy.optimize.SLSQP for circle packing - a completely different algorithmic paradigm than it started with. It's genuinely discovering new approaches, not just parameter-tuning.

          • quantbagel 5 days ago

            Sakana.ai improved on this by honing in on sample efficiency iirc with shinkaevolve (which is open source and not an ai slop project)