• fred_is_fred 18 hours ago

    These moves are always about getting people to quit and nothing else.

    • lovich a day ago

      Why would the leaders care?

      It’s currently a buyers market for employees, they can flex as much as they want and desperate people will still flock to them.

      The RTO mandates were not done with productivity in mind.

      • alephnerd a day ago

        It's 2026.

        If you are truly exceptional, you will get a WFH allowance in most organizations - that said, most developers are not.

        If you want to be remote-first you will have to become mission critical, otherwise it is hard to justify not hiring someone in India, Israel, or Poland remotely.

        • Rodeoclash a day ago

          The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation.

          • pratchett 21 hours ago

            How do you justify this assertion of yours? I would contend that the most efficient method is written down and shared widely in a doc. Otherwise, everyone is relying on their memory of what was spoken. For anything non trivial, I would want it written down.

          • andOlga 20 hours ago

            Reading is significantly faster than listening. Writing is significantly more precise than speaking. You're gonna have to write information down so that it's not lost anyway.

            • zwaps 16 hours ago

              Yes however speaking allows flexibility in communication, dynamics that text does not support and, crucial if there is no alignment, nonverbal communication.

              It is much much easier to build trust in person, which is important for efficient teams.

              In the end, both modes have pros and cons, but there is indeed a lot of research indicating remote teamwork is much more challenging on many dimensions

              • andOlga 16 hours ago

                To me all of this reads like gibberish but I'll admit that it's likely just me (and "my kind" of neurodivergent people). Far as dynamics go (ability to interrupt) voice chat solves the problem fully as far as I'm concerned. Non-verbal comms are lost on me to the point that I don't know what you even mean, and I simply cannot trust anyone who is close enough to me to potentially punch me...

                Again, granted -- I'm an outlier, but that also means that I can just operate at my full capacity when I work with text and cannot when I work "in person".

            • aeternum 20 hours ago

              Did you remember to consider commute times, context-switching costs, office overhead and facilities staff overhead in your efficiency calculation?

              • hackable_sand 14 hours ago

                Beep boop

                Now initiating information transfer protocol

                Beep boop

                Please acknowledge receipt

                • pvab3 21 hours ago

                  speak for yourself