The headline is odd to me given that the article spent so much time comparing it to M5 and still loses considerably to the M5 in single core (199 vs 130).
And it only wins in multi-core simply because it has 16-cores while the M5 base only has 10-cores.
When Apple launches the M5 Pro and/or Ultra this won't be the case.
The reviewed laptop is 14" 32GB 1TB $1,299.
14-inch MacBook Pro M5 with 24GB $1,999.
Intel is -35% price, +60% cores, and most importantly given the 4x prices +33% RAM.
And you can run Windows games and Linux on it.
The reviewed MSI looks like a great 2-in-1, but a laptop is also more than its CPU and RAM. The MBP's screen has substantially higher resolution and brightness and refresh rate, for instance. I'm not saying the MSI isn't a good deal, just that it's not reasonable to compare the prices of two laptops like that.
Yes you can, because if the user wanted a better screen, he would likely have purchased a laptop with a better screen. You can buy any sort of screen you want in an x86 laptop, from really crappy to better-than-Mac.
You're not comparing the price of the Intel chip that way, though, which is what GP did.
The vast majority of the PC computing world still uses Windows, which doesn’t run on Macs, and Windows on ARM is still in its infancy. An Intel-based chip that’s on par with Apple Silicon is much desired by the marketplace.
AMD is already serving that segment, and quite successfully, too. I would assume Panther Lake is an improvement for Intel, most notably in the I/O department, but is it really "on par" even with the recent Ryzen variants, let alone Apple Silicon?
You don't get 22 hours of battery life out of a Ryzen laptop.
You don't get 22 hours of battery life out of any laptop. Maybe when it sits idle, but we usually turn our laptops on to do something.
I can buy this and install whatever OS I like, though. And I am pretty sure I will 100% own the hardware.
How is Linux support on the M5? There is more to a CPU or system than a single benchmark number.
Ashai linux people are still working on support. They just posted support for M3.
So it's useless to me.
You could contribute to the Ashai project if them not yet spending their OSS time budget on the latest m-series chip when they have a backlog is such a problem for you.
Or he could buy a laptop with a slightly slower chip which runs well with Linux and not pay money and his time for privilege of supporting a company building incompatible products.
[dead]
Given the timing, it's unlikely this generation of Intel integrated graphics makes use of Nvidia RTX chips. So, the gain on integrated graphics this generation seems impressive, given that graphics isn't Intel's strong suit.
Note that parts of this line are still manufactured by TSMC. Intel is still not there in terms of fab self-sufficiency.
Unfortunately Intel also isn't interested in making Panther Lake:
> "We can’t completely vacate the client market," said Zinsner, but Intel is "shifting as much as we can over to data center to meet the high demand."
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/core-ultra-series-3-...
So many smart best things going on on PL. Xe3 GPU looks amazing, especially the 12 core one. I love the extra low power core on the soc chiplet, allowing the main CPU chiplet to post down. Intel's EIMB is great, such an advanced interconnect for low power multi-chip. 18a and backside power. Excellent stuff!
Hard to blame them though for abandoning consumer market, like is happening with the entire rest of the computing market. Why make cores if the rest of the computer is too ghastly expensive to afford?